Summary
The court affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of the plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. It held that the administrative law judge’s residual functional capacity determination, including the treatment of medical opinions, sit/stand limitations, and environmental restrictions, was supported by substantial evidence and free of legal error. The court also concluded that any error concerning environmental limitations would be harmless because the plaintiff’s past relevant work did not involve the identified environmental hazards.
Holdings
- The ALJ properly evaluated the medical opinion evidence and was not required to include a sit/stand option because the residual functional capacity was supported by substantial evidence and the consultative examiner's statements were not functionally specific.
- The ALJ adequately explained the environmental limitations included in the RFC, and the finding that plaintiff needed to avoid concentrated exposure to respiratory irritants was supported by substantial evidence.
- Even if the ALJ should have imposed greater environmental restrictions, remand was not required because plaintiff's past relevant jobs did not involve exposure to the relevant environmental hazards.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated the consultative examiner's opinion and was required to include a sit/stand option in the residual functional capacity.
- Whether the ALJ adequately explained the residual functional capacity's environmental limitations concerning fumes, odors, dusts, gases, and poor ventilation.
- Whether any error in assessing environmental limitations required remand.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (20)
- Shaw v. Chater, 221 F.3d 126, 131 (2d Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)(followed)
- Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. 97, 103 (2019)(followed)
- Colgan v. Kijakazi, 22 F.4th 353, 359 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Talavera v. Astrue, 697 F.3d 145, 151 (2d Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Cichocki v. Astrue, 729 F.3d 172, 177 (2d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security, 855 F. App'x 46, 48 (2d Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Schillo v. Kijakazi, 31 F.4th 64, 78 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Matta v. Astrue, 508 F. App'x 53, 56 (2d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Douglas C. v. Commissioner of Social Security, 717 F. Supp. 3d 289, 298 (W.D.N.Y. 2024)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…