Melinda N. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Melinda N. · United States District Court for the Western District of New York · March 18, 2026 · No. 1:24-cv-00559 (JGW)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of New York granted the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, denied the Commissioner’s motion, and remanded the Social Security disability claim for further proceedings. The court held that the ALJ did not adequately explain how the 10% off-task limitation in the residual functional capacity was formulated, particularly in relation to the time required to service the plaintiff’s colostomy bag and check blood sugar.

Holdings

  1. The ALJ's residual functional capacity finding was not meaningfully reviewable because the decision did not explain how the specific 10-percent off-task limitation was derived from the evidence concerning Plaintiff's colostomy care and blood-sugar monitoring.
  2. The court did not reach the merits of Plaintiff's separate argument that the ALJ failed to address the time required for restroom and colostomy-related breaks.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ALJ's residual functional capacity finding, specifically the limitation allowing Plaintiff to be off task up to 10 percent of the workday, was supported by substantial evidence and adequately explained.
  2. Whether the ALJ adequately addressed Plaintiff's need for restroom and colostomy-related breaks in formulating the residual functional capacity.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (20)

  • Talavera v. Astrue, 697 F.3d 145, 151 (2d Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Moran v. Astrue, 569 F.3d 496, 501 (2d Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Williams v. Bowen, 859 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • McIntyre v. Colvin, 758 F.3d 146, 149 (2d Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Yancey v. Apfel, 145 F.3d 106, 111 (2d Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Schillo v. Kijakazi, 31 F.4th 64, 78 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Desirae D. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 20-cv-00054-JGW, 2021 WL 2042576, at *3 (W.D.N.Y. May 21, 2021)(followed)
  • Matta v. Astrue, 508 F. App’x 53, 56 (2d Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Rebecca B. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 22-cv-00631-HKS, 2025 WL 90625, at *4 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2025)(followed)
  • Estrella v. Berryhill, 925 F.3d 90, 95 (2d Cir. 2019)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…