Walter T. Gause v. Leslie Cooley Dismukes

Gause · United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division · December 10, 2025 · No. 3:23-cv-00660-MR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina construed Walter T. Gause's filing under the All Writs Act as a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court dismissed the petition as an unauthorized successive petition because Gause had not obtained authorization from the Fourth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), declined to issue a certificate of appealability, and directed that Leslie Cooley Dismukes be substituted as respondent.

Holdings

  1. The court construed Petitioner's submission styled under the All Writs Act as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
  2. A second or successive § 2254 petition may not be filed in the district court without prior authorization from the appropriate court of appeals; absent that authorization, the district court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss the petition.
  3. The court declined to issue a certificate of appealability.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the filing should be construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
  2. Whether the petition was an unauthorized successive habeas petition requiring dismissal because Petitioner had not obtained authorization from the appropriate court of appeals.
  3. Whether a certificate of appealability should issue.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (9)

  • State v. Gause, 772 S.E.2d 265, 2015 WL 1529828, at *1-2 (N.C. Ct. App. 2015) (unpublished)(followed)
  • Gause v. Perry, No. 3:16-cv-00631-FDW, 2017 WL 581331, at *1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2017)(followed)
  • Gause v. Perry, 697 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Gause v. Hooks, Case No. 3:20-cv-00306-MR, 2020 WL 6689358, at *2-3 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2020)(followed)
  • Gause v. Hooks, 837 F. App'x 1002 (4th Cir. 2021) (mem.) (unpublished)(followed)
  • Gause v. Isha, Case No. 3:23-cv-00382-MR, Document 12 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2023)(followed)
  • Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147, 153 (2007)(followed)
  • Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003)(followed)
  • Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…