Koy Lynn Chiu v. Global Realty Investor Trust Mgmt, et al.

No. 3:25-CV-00583-MEO (W.D.N.C. June 25, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division · June 25, 2026 · No. 3:25-CV-00583-MEO

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina dismissed Koy Lynn Chiu’s claims seeking to challenge a state-court foreclosure proceeding. The court held that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprived it of subject-matter jurisdiction because the requested relief would require review and rejection of the state-court foreclosure order. Defendants’ motions to dismiss were granted, Plaintiff’s pending motions were denied as moot, and the case was closed.

Holdings

  1. The federal district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because plaintiff was a state-court loser seeking federal review and rejection of a final state-court foreclosure judgment.
  2. Because subject-matter jurisdiction was lacking, the court could not consider the merits of the pending motions; defendants' motions to dismiss were granted, plaintiff's motions were denied as moot, and the action was dismissed in its entirety.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the federal district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over claims seeking to invalidate or obtain review of a state-court foreclosure judgment.
  2. Whether the court could reach the merits of defendants' motions to dismiss and plaintiff's pending motions after determining that subject-matter jurisdiction was absent.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (9)

  • 2026 WL 1751823, at *5 (U.S. June 18, 2026)(followed)
  • 607 U.S. 421, 424 (2026)(followed)
  • 398 U.S. 281, 286 (1970)(followed)
  • 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005)(followed)
  • 526 F. App'x 231, 236 (4th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114380, at *4 (W.D.N.C. July 10, 2018)(followed)
  • 2014 WL 2861800, at *2-*3 (W.D.N.C. June 24, 2014)(followed)
  • 2015 WL 3952332, at *3 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2015)(followed)
  • 572 F.3d 176, 180 (4th Cir. 2009)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…