Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss federal race- and age-discrimination and retaliation claims as untimely under the applicable 90-day filing requirement following an EEOC right-to-sue notice. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims, dismissed them without prejudice, and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- Claims subject to the EEOC right-to-sue notice must be filed in federal court within 90 days after receipt of the notice; because Plaintiff filed more than one year after the deadline, her federal claims were untimely and had to be dismissed.
- After dismissal of all viable federal claims, the court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims; the court therefore declined jurisdiction and dismissed those claims without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's federal employment-discrimination and retaliation claims were untimely because she failed to file suit within 90 days after receiving the EEOC right-to-sue letter.
- Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining North Carolina state-law claims after dismissing the federal claims.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 n.7 (1988)(followed)
- ESAB Grp., Inc. v. Zurich Ins. PLC, 685 F.3d 376, 394 (4th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Mann v. Power Home Solar, LLC, No. 5:21CV00166KDBDSC, 2022 WL 602196, at *2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2022)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…