Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina granted defendants’ motion to dismiss claims seeking placement on the U-visa waiting list and employment authorization. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction over claims concerning delayed adjudication of discretionary work-authorization requests and that plaintiffs had not plausibly shown that the approximately thirteen-month delay in waiting-list adjudication was unreasonable under the TRAC factors. The court also dismissed the corresponding Mandamus Act claim and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- The court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claims challenging the withholding or delay of work-authorization adjudications before placement on the U-visa waiting list because the Secretary and USCIS were not legally required to adjudicate or grant such discretionary work authorization.
- Although Plaintiffs' claim concerning a waiting-list determination was ripe and judicially reviewable, Plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege that the approximately thirteen-month delay was unreasonable under the Administrative Procedure Act.
- The mandamus claim failed because the standard for unreasonable delay under the Mandamus Act is identical to the APA standard, and Plaintiffs did not plausibly allege unreasonable delay.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court had subject-matter jurisdiction over claims alleging that Defendants unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed adjudication of Plaintiffs' pre-waiting-list work-authorization requests.
- Whether Plaintiffs plausibly alleged that Defendants unreasonably delayed adjudicating their U-visa petitions and determining their eligibility for placement on the U-visa waiting list under the Administrative Procedure Act.
- Whether Plaintiffs' mandamus claim failed because the alleged delay was not unreasonable under the applicable standard.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (15)
- Chris v. Tenet, 221 F.3d 648, 655 (4th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994)(followed)
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55, 63-64 (2004)(followed)
- Gonzalez v. Cuccinelli, 985 F.3d 357, 363-66, 374-75 (4th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 80 (D.C. Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Patel v. Noem, 788 F. Supp. 3d 950, 956 (N.D. Ill. 2025)(followed)
- Andrade Carranza v. Cuccinelli, 2020 WL 6292639, at *1, *5, *10 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2020)(followed)
- Torres-Tristan v. Holder, 656 F.3d 653, 656 n.3 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Kim v. Ashcroft, 340 F. Supp. 2d 384, 393 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)(followed)
- Mueller v. Blinken, 682 F. Supp. 3d 528, 537-39 (E.D. Va. 2023)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.