Tonia Williams and Beverly Dantzler v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

Civil Action No. 3:25-CV-00144-KDB-WCM · United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina · June 22, 2026 · No. 3:25-CV-00144-KDB-WCM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina grants final approval of a class-action settlement between Tonia Williams, Beverly Dantzler, and PHH Mortgage Corporation concerning alleged false threats in mortgage default notices. The court certifies settlement classes, approves the notice process and settlement, and partially grants the motion for attorney’s fees by finding the requested fees excessive in light of the limited class recovery and lack of nonmonetary relief.

Holdings

  1. The FDCPA, California, and North Carolina settlement classes satisfied the applicable requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b) for settlement purposes and were finally certified.
  2. The settlement notice program constituted the best practicable notice under the circumstances and satisfied Rule 23, due process, and applicable notice requirements.
  3. The settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate under Rule 23(e) and was approved.
  4. The requested attorneys' fees were excessive; the court awarded $275,536 in fees and $8,003.82 in expenses, for a total of $283,539.82.
  5. The requested $5,000 service award for each named plaintiff was reasonable and approved.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the proposed settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e).
  2. Whether the settlement classes should be finally certified for settlement purposes under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b).
  3. Whether the notice provided to the settlement class satisfied Rule 23, due process, and the best-practicable-notice requirement.
  4. Whether the requested attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and service awards were reasonable.
  5. Whether the action should be dismissed with prejudice and the settlement release and claim-preclusion provisions enforced.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (24)

  • Brent v. Advanced Med. Mgmt., LLC, 733 F. Supp. 3d 376, 380 (D. Md. 2024)(followed)
  • Rodriguez v. Nat'l City Bank, 726 F.3d 372, 382 (3d Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • In re Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Prods. Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 952 F.3d 471, 483-84 (4th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Sharp Farms v. Speaks, 917 F.3d 276, 293-94 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co., 67 F.3d 1072, 1078 (2d Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • 1988 Tr. for Allen Child. Dated 8/8/88 v. Banner Life Ins. Co., 28 F.4th 513, 520-21, 525, 527 (4th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Berry v. Schulman, 807 F.3d 600, 613-14, 618 (4th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • In re Jiffy Lube Sec. Litig., 927 F.2d 155, 158-59 (4th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • In re MicroStrategy, Inc. Sec. Litig., 148 F. Supp. 2d 654, 663 (E.D. Va. 2001)(followed)
  • Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797, 812-13 (1985)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…