Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation concerning Defendant Turn Key Health Clinics’ motion to dismiss. The court found that Plaintiff stated an Eighth Amendment claim but dismissed without prejudice her state-law negligence claim against Turn Key, concluding that amendment would be futile.
Holdings
- When neither party timely objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court may review the recommendation for plain error on the face of the record.
- Turn Key's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's state-law negligence claim was granted, and the claim was dismissed without prejudice.
- The motion to dismiss was denied in part as to Plaintiff's federal claim because Plaintiff stated a valid Eighth Amendment claim against Turn Key for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and unconstitutional conditions of confinement.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when the parties do not timely object to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation?
- Whether Turn Key's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's state-law negligence claim should be granted.
- Whether dismissal of the state negligence claim should be without prejudice where Plaintiff had not previously attempted to amend the complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Gray v. Geo Grp., Inc., 727 F. App'x 940, 946 (10th Cir. 2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…