Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma denied Corporal Korbin Taylor Williams’s motion to dismiss for failure to timely serve process. The court found good cause to extend the service deadline by 60 days because Plaintiff made multiple service attempts and the statute of limitations had expired or was about to expire.
Holdings
- The one-day entry of appearance filed on behalf of Corporal Williams did not establish service because the attorneys promptly filed amended entries of appearance correcting the error, and the amended entries governed.
- Plaintiff demonstrated good cause for extending the deadline to serve Corporal Williams under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
- Dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against Corporal Williams based on the statute of limitations was improper at that point because good cause supported extending the service deadline and dismissal would bar refiling.
Questions Presented
- Whether the attorneys' one-day entry of appearance on behalf of Corporal Williams constituted service under Oklahoma law.
- Whether Plaintiff showed good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) to extend the deadline for serving Corporal Williams.
- Whether dismissal based on expiration of the statute of limitations was appropriate when Plaintiff had not yet properly served Corporal Williams.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Espinoza v. United States, 52 F.3d 838, 842 (10th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- McCarty v. Gilchrist, 646 F.3d 1281, 1289 (10th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 387 (2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…