Blackburn v. United States

Blackburn · United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma · April 7, 2026 · No. CIV-22-983-G

Summary

The court denied Plaintiff Tyeashia M. Blackburn’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, finding no sanctionable conduct by defense counsel. The court also held that Plaintiff failed to comply with Rule 11’s 21-day safe-harbor requirement and denied Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s supplemental briefs.

Holdings

  1. Defendant's counsel did not violate Rule 11 by citing Plaintiff's prior lawsuit because the citation was made for a proper litigation purpose: identifying the standards applicable to pro se litigants and arguing that Plaintiff remained subject to applicable procedural rules.
  2. A sanctions motion that is not served on the opposing party at least 21 days before filing does not satisfy Rule 11(c)(2)'s safe-harbor requirement, and sanctions cannot properly be granted on that motion.
  3. Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's supplemental briefs was denied.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Defendant's counsel engaged in conduct warranting sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's failure to serve the sanctions motion before filing it violated Rule 11(c)(2)'s 21-day safe-harbor requirement.
  3. Whether Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's supplemental briefs should be granted.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Roth v. Green, 466 F.3d 1179, 1192 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Mellott v. MSN Communications, Inc., 492 F. App'x 887, 888 (10th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Blackburn v. Webb, No. CIV-23-379-R (W.D. Okla.)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…