Blackburn v. United States

Blackburn v. United States · United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma · April 7, 2026 · No. CIV-22-983-G

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma denied Plaintiff Tyeashia M. Blackburn’s motion in limine concerning the testimony of Defendant’s non-retained treating physicians. The Court found the motion premature and insufficiently specific, determined that the cited authorities did not support the requested relief, and noted that the cited mischaracterizations could implicate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.

Holdings

  1. The motion is denied because it is premature, lacks specificity, and Plaintiff's cited authority fails to demonstrate entitlement to relief on the merits.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff's Motion in Limine should be granted to enforce requirements for testimony of Defendant's non-retained treating physicians.

Disposition

denied

Cases Cited (6)

  • Hussein v. Duncan Reg’l Hosp., Inc., No. CIV-07-439-F, 2009 WL 10672480 (W.D. Okla. Oct. 20, 2009)(discussed)
  • Davoll v. Webb, 194 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 1999)(misapplied)
  • Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma, 611 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2010)(misapplied)
  • Hall v. United States, 2018 WL 1620923 (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2018)(misapplied)
  • Clark v. CoreCivic, Inc., No. CIV-25-775-SLP, 2025 WL 3709023 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 22, 2025)(applied)
  • Dodds v. Bridges, No. 25-7021, 2026 WL 380194 (10th Cir. Feb. 11, 2026)(applied)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…