Jacqueline Smith v. Lawton Public Schools

Case No. CIV-25-1046-G (W.D. Okla. Feb. 6, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma · February 6, 2026 · No. CIV-25-1046-G

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma considers Plaintiff Jacqueline Smith’s request for additional time to serve Lawton Public Schools under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Although the Court finds that Plaintiff did not establish good cause, it grants a permissive 21-day extension because dismissal could bar her Title VII claims under the applicable 90-day filing period.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff did not establish good cause for the untimely service because counsel's errors, inadvertence, negligence, mistake, and the absence of prejudice were insufficient.
  2. A permissive extension was warranted because dismissal could bar Plaintiff's Title VII claims from being refiled after expiration of the federal limitations period.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff established good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failing to timely serve Defendant.
  2. Whether the Court should grant a permissive extension of the service deadline despite Plaintiff's failure to establish good cause.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Despain v. Salt Lake Area Metro Gang Unit, 13 F.3d 1436, 1438-1439 (10th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • In re Kirkland, 86 F.3d 172, 176 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Espinoza v. United States, 52 F.3d 838, 841-842 (10th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Brown v. Hartshorne Pub. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 926 F.2d 959, 961 (10th Cir. 1991)(applied)
  • Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (2002)(cited as subsequent treatment)
  • Rogers v. Curahealth Okla., LLC, No. CIV-22-670-R, 2023 WL 6222406, at *3 (W.D. Okla. Sept. 25, 2023)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…