Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma grants the petitioner's motion to consolidate his immigration-detention habeas action with a related action filed by his father. The court designates the present case as the lead case, directs that future pleadings be filed only in that case, and administratively closes the related action.
Holdings
- The court held that consolidation was appropriate because the actions involved common questions of law or fact, asserted nearly identical claims, involved the same respondent, were at the same litigation stage, and could be consolidated without apparent prejudice or confusion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the two related habeas actions should be consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Cheney v. Judd, 429 F. Supp. 3d 931, 936 (D.N.M. 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…