Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma granted the City of Oklahoma City’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court held that the Oklahoma City Commercial Developers Association lacked associational standing under Hunt’s third prong to seek monetary refunds of development fees on behalf of its members because awarding refunds would require individualized assessments and member participation. The court did not resolve the underlying merits of the alleged Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and Oklahoma statutory claims.
Holdings
- An association lacks associational standing to seek monetary refunds for its members when awarding the refunds requires the court to identify the affected members, determine the number and amount of their payments, verify the amounts owed, and direct each refund to the proper recipient.
- Judgment on the pleadings should be granted to the City because the Oklahoma City Commercial Developers Association lacks standing to pursue monetary refunds on behalf of its members.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Oklahoma City Commercial Developers Association has associational standing to seek monetary refunds of development fees paid by its members.
- Whether the requested refunds require individual member participation under the third prong of the associational-standing test.
- Whether judgment on the pleadings was appropriate because the association lacked standing to pursue the requested monetary relief.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- Zevallos v. Allstate Property & Casualty Co., 776 F. App'x 559, 561 n.1 (10th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of Wichita, 226 F.3d 1138, 1160 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Woodie v. Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Co., 806 F. App'x 658, 666 (10th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Diversey v. Schmidly, 738 F.3d 1196, 1199 (10th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA, 442 F.3d 1239, 1244 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Magnus, Inc. v. Diamond State Insurance Co., 545 F. App'x 750 (10th Cir. 2013)(noted)
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994)(followed)
- Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…