Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered findings of fact and conclusions of law after a bench trial concerning Defendant’s use of the domain name "basstank.com," which incorporated Plaintiff’s THE BASS TANK trademark. The Court awarded Plaintiff $7,308.03 in disgorged profits and $40,000 in statutory cybersquatting damages, entered a permanent injunction, and ordered transfer of the domain name. The Court denied attorneys’ fees but permitted Plaintiff to submit a bill of costs.
Holdings
- Plaintiff was entitled to recover $7,308.03, representing defendant's gross online sales during the relevant period, because defendant failed to prove any costs or deductions.
- Enhanced damages were not warranted because an award greater than $7,308.03 would constitute a prohibited penalty rather than compensation.
- Plaintiff was entitled to $40,000 in statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d) for defendant's violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d).
- The court entered a permanent injunction barring defendant from using THE BASS TANK mark or confusingly similar variations and ordered defendant to transfer basstank.com to plaintiff within fourteen days after entry of judgment.
- Plaintiff was not entitled to attorneys' fees because the case was not exceptional, but plaintiff could submit a bill of costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 within thirty days after entry of judgment.
Questions Presented
- What amount of defendant's profits was recoverable under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) for the relevant period?
- Whether enhanced damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) were warranted.
- What amount of statutory damages was appropriate under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d) for defendant's cybersquatting violation?
- Whether plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction and transfer of the basstank.com domain under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116(a) and 1125(d)(1)(C).
- Whether plaintiff was entitled to attorneys' fees and costs under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (13)
- W. Diversified Serv., Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., 427 F.3d 1269, 1272 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Klein-Becker USA, LLC v. Englert, 711 F.3d 1153, 1163 (10th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Vitamins Online, Inc. v. Heartwise, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-982-DAK, 2020 WL 6581050, at *22 (D. Utah Nov. 10, 2020)(followed)
- CrossFit, Inc. v. Jenkins, 69 F. Supp. 3d 1088, 1101, 1103 (D. Colo. 2014)(followed)
- Wecosign, Inc. v. IFG Holdings, Inc., 845 F. Supp. 2d 1072, 1086 (C.D. Cal. 2012)(followed)
- St. Luke’s Cataract and Laser Institute, P.A. v. Sanderson, 573 F.3d 1186, 1206 (11th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. J.F. Reichert, Inc., 658 F. Supp. 458, 465 (E.D. Pa. 1987)(followed)
- Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Found. for Apologetic Info. & Research, 527 F.3d 1045, 1058 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545, 554, 557 (2014)(followed)
- Aftwear, Inc. v. Mast-Jaegermeister US, Inc., No. 22-4020, 2023 WL 8232072, at *2 (10th Cir. Nov. 28, 2023)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…