Summary
This order addresses a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the petitioner’s immigration detention at the Diamondback Correctional Facility in Oklahoma. The court directs respondents to answer or file a pre-answer motion, requires advance notice of any transfer, and directs the clerk regarding service and summonses.
Holdings
- The court ordered respondents to file an answer under Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, or alternatively to file a pre-answer motion, and established deadlines for petitioner's reply or response.
- Because the petition alleged that petitioner was confined within the Western District of Oklahoma, respondents were required to provide written notice at least seventy-two hours before removing, transferring, relocating, or otherwise moving petitioner, and to identify her facility promptly if they disputed that she was within the district.
Questions Presented
- What procedural response should respondents make to the § 2241 habeas petition?
- What procedures should govern any transfer or relocation of petitioner while the habeas case is pending?
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Boutwell v. Keating, 399 F.3d 1203, 1210 n.2 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…