Stewart Abramson, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated v. Line 5, LLC, et al.

Abramson · United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania · January 22, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-288

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal-related relief in a putative class action involving Headstart Warranty Group, LLC and Line 5, LLC. The court granted the motion insofar as it directed transfer of the matter to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and ordered the case closed upon transfer.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Writing for the Court
Robert J. Colville
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Decision date
January 22, 2026
Docket number
2:25-cv-288
Procedural posture
The district court reviewed a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation recommending disposition of a motion to dismiss filed by Headstart Warranty Group, LLC and joined by Line 5, LLC. No objections were filed. The district court adopted the Report and Recommendation and ordered transfer of the action to the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Standard of review
For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court must make a de novo determination of portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections are made. Even absent objections, the court must afford dispositive legal issues some level of review, described by the Third Circuit as reasoned consideration. For non-dispositive matters, review is for clear error or whether the order is contrary to law.
Precedential value
Unpublished district court order; precedential status not established in the source metadata.
Disposition
other

Topics

motions to dismissvenuecivil procedurecommercial litigationclass actions

Practice areas

civil procedurecommercial litigationcontracts

Questions Presented

  1. What level of review should the district court apply to a magistrate judge's dispositive Report and Recommendation when no objections are filed?
  2. Whether to adopt the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation and transfer the action to the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Holdings

  1. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's dispositive Report and Recommendation, the district court must nevertheless afford the dispositive legal issues some level of review, characterized by the Third Circuit as reasoned consideration.
  2. After reasoned consideration, the district court accepted and adopted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation in its entirety and granted the motion insofar as the action was transferred to the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Key quotations

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has explained that, “even absent objections to the report and recommendation, a district court should ‘afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report,’” and has “described this level of review as ‘reasoned consideration.’”
The Court agrees with the thorough and well-reasoned analysis set forth in Judge Dodge’s Report and Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts Judge Dodge’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the Court with respect to Headstart’s Motion to Dismiss.

Factual background

Stewart Abramson brought the action individually and on behalf of a putative class against Line 5, LLC and other defendants, including Headstart Warranty Group, LLC. Headstart filed a motion to dismiss, and Line 5 joined that motion. The magistrate judge recommended disposition of the motion and transfer of the matter to the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Procedural history

Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge issued a September 19, 2025 Report and Recommendation recommending that the court grant Headstart's motion to dismiss, joined by Line 5. After the objection deadline passed without objections, District Judge Robert J. Colville gave the dispositive issues reasoned consideration, adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, granted the motion insofar as the action would be transferred, and directed the Clerk to transfer and close the case.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…