Shawn F. Shaw v. Brian Eller, Warden

No. 1:25-cv-01252-JDB-jay (W.D. Tenn. June 15, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Eastern Division · June 16, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-01252-JDB-jay

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee dismissed Shawn F. Shaw’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice because he had not exhausted his claims in state court. The court denied a certificate of appealability and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Holdings

  1. Shaw failed to exhaust his state-court remedies because he did not fairly present the claims asserted in his federal petition to the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
  2. The § 2254 petition was dismissed without prejudice to Shaw's right to file a new petition after exhausting his claims in state court.
  3. A certificate of appealability was denied because reasonable jurists would not debate the correctness of the dismissal for failure to exhaust.
  4. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal was denied, and the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Shaw's § 2254 claims were exhausted in the Tennessee courts.
  2. Whether the federal habeas petition should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state-court remedies.
  3. Whether Shaw was entitled to a certificate of appealability after the procedural dismissal.
  4. Whether Shaw should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (8)

  • State v. Shaw, 715 S.W.3d 340, 343 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024)(applied)
  • Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 518-19 (1982)(followed)
  • Adams v. Holland, 330 F.3d 398, 402 (6th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Wagner v. Smith, 581 F.3d 410, 414 (6th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Rust v. Zent, 17 F.3d 155, 160 (6th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Rhines v. Weber, 554 U.S. 269, 277 (2005)(followed)
  • Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
  • Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…