Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee dismissed Djibril H. Samassa’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order requiring payment of the habeas filing fee. The court denied a certificate of appealability and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, certifying that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Holdings
- A § 2241 petition may be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when the petitioner fails to comply with a court order requiring payment of the habeas filing fee after receiving notice that noncompliance would result in dismissal.
- A certificate of appealability should be denied because reasonable jurists would not debate either the validity of the asserted constitutional claim or the correctness of the procedural dismissal.
- Leave to appeal in forma pauperis must be denied and the appeal certified as not taken in good faith when the petitioner has not shown a nonfrivolous basis for appellate review of the dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should dismiss the § 2241 petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's fee order.
- Whether Samassa was entitled to a certificate of appealability after the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds.
- Whether Samassa should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Winburn v. Nagy, 956 F.3d 909, 912 (6th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 337 (2003)(followed)
- Bradley v. Birkett, 156 F. App’x 771, 773 (6th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…