Andrea Jaye Mosby v. Reaves Law Firm PLLC

Mosby v. Reaves Law Firm PLLC · United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee · April 7, 2026 · No. 2:23-cv-02099-SHM-tmp

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee denied Reaves Law Firm PLLC’s motion to stay execution of a money judgment pending appeal. The court held that, absent a supersedeas bond, the defendant had not demonstrated extraordinary circumstances warranting waiver of the bond requirement, and permitted the plaintiff to continue executing on the judgment.

Holdings

  1. A party is entitled to a stay of execution of a money judgment as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d) only upon posting a satisfactory, court-approved supersedeas bond.
  2. A court may exercise discretionary authority to reduce or waive the supersedeas-bond requirement, but the appellant must demonstrate extraordinary circumstances justifying an unsecured or reduced-bond stay.
  3. Defendant failed to establish extraordinary circumstances warranting waiver or reduction of the supersedeas-bond requirement, so the motion to stay execution was denied.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Defendant was entitled to an automatic stay of execution pending appeal without posting a supersedeas bond.
  2. Whether Defendant demonstrated extraordinary circumstances sufficient to justify waiving or reducing the supersedeas-bond requirement.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (18)

  • Arban v. W. Publ'g Corp., 345 F.3d 390, 409 (6th Cir.)(followed)
  • Hamlin v. Charter Twp. of Flint, 181 F.R.D. 348, 351, 353 (E.D. Mich.)(followed)
  • Transp. Ins. Co. v. Citizens Ins. Co. of Am., No. 08-15018, 2013 WL 4604126, at *4 (E.D. Mich.)(followed)
  • Titan Tire Corp. of Bryan v. United Steel Workers of Am., Local 890L, No. 09-4460, 2010 WL 815557, at *1 (6th Cir.)(followed)
  • United States v. GE, 397 F. App'x 144, 151 (6th Cir.)(followed)
  • Koshani v. Barton, No. 3:17-CV-265, 2019 WL 7288802, at *2 (E.D. Tenn.)(followed)
  • Murray v. Williams, No. 3:15-cv-284, 2017 WL 2469162, at *2 (E.D. Tenn.)(followed)
  • Maxum Indem. Co. v. Drive W. Ins. Servs., Inc., No. 13-cv-191, 2019 WL 340107, at *1 (S.D. Ohio)(followed)
  • Am. Furukawa, Inc. v. Hossain, No. 14-13633, 2017 WL 9719047, at *2-*3 (E.D. Mich.)(followed)
  • Bank v. Byrd, No. 10-02004, 2012 WL 5384162, at *3 (W.D. Tenn.)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…