Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee denied Robert Wegner, M.D.’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Applying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the court held that newly discovered evidence concerning a December 6, 2025 telephone call did not alter its prior conclusion that Wegner lacked standing for the requested injunctive relief.
Holdings
- Reconsideration of the prior interlocutory order was not warranted because the December 6 telephone call was the same type of evidence previously considered and did not establish an intervening change in law, clear error, manifest injustice, or materially different grounds for relief.
- The December 6 telephone call did not establish an injury in fact or redressable harm sufficient to give Wegner standing for the requested extraordinary relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should reconsider its interlocutory order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) based on the December 6, 2025 telephone call and related communications.
- Whether the alleged new evidence altered the court's prior conclusion that Wegner lacked standing to obtain temporary or preliminary injunctive relief.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Rodriguez v. Tenn. Laborers Health & Welfare Fund, 89 F. App'x 949, 959 (6th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 446 U.S. 1, 10 (1980)(followed)
- Am. Marietta Corp. v. Essroc Cement Corp., 59 F. App'x 668, 671 (6th Cir. 2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…