Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas partially grants and partially denies American General Life Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss claims arising from the alleged lapse and attempted reinstatement of a life insurance policy. The court dismisses the bankruptcy trustee’s breach-of-contract claim for lack of standing and dismisses the trustee’s Texas Insurance Code § 541 and Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims as time-barred. The court allows TuYo Holdings’ breach-of-contract claim and the plaintiffs’ Texas Insurance Code § 542 claim to proceed, and directs that the case be reopened and the stay lifted.
Holdings
- Based on its admission that the assignment to Tuyo was valid and enforceable, Policy Services did not have standing under the current pleadings to assert the breach-of-contract claim. The court dismissed Policy Services as a plaintiff on that claim.
- Tuyo sufficiently pleaded a breach-of-contract claim to survive Rule 12(b)(6).
- Policy Services' Texas Insurance Code section 541 and Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims were barred by the applicable two-year limitations period and were dismissed.
- The Texas Insurance Code section 542 unfair-claim-settlement-practices claim asserted by Tuyo and Policy Services survived the motion to dismiss.
- The court declined to permit another amended complaint because plaintiffs had already been given adequate opportunity to plead their best case and the court's standing order provided that another amendment would not be allowed after a meritorious motion to dismiss.
Questions Presented
- Whether Policy Services, LLC had standing to assert a breach-of-contract claim after assigning all rights in the Dean Policy to Tuyo Holdings.
- Whether Tuyo adequately pleaded a breach-of-contract claim under Rule 12(b)(6).
- Whether Policy Services' Texas Insurance Code section 541 and Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims were barred by the applicable two-year limitations period.
- Whether the Texas Insurance Code section 542 unfair-claim-settlement-practices claim should be dismissed because it depended on the breach-of-contract claim.
- Whether plaintiffs should receive another opportunity to amend their complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (18)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-558, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Clark v. Amoco Prod. Co., 794 F.2d 967, 970 (5th Cir.)(followed)
- Frith v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 9 F. Supp. 2d 734, 737-38 (S.D. Tex.)(followed)
- Jones v. Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 324 (5th Cir.)(followed)
- Vander Zee v. Reno, 73 F.3d 1365, 1368 (5th Cir.)(followed)
- Brand Coupon Network, L.L.C. v. Catalina Mktg. Corp., 748 F.3d 631, 635 (5th Cir.)(followed)
- Martin K. Eby Constr. Co. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 369 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir.)(followed)
- Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)(followed)
- Hitt v. City of Pasadena, 561 F.2d 606, 608-09 (5th Cir.)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.