German Quintanilla v. Landstar Ranger, Inc. et al.

Quintanilla · United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Harrisonburg Division · December 23, 2025 · No. 5:24-cv-00061

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia granted German Quintanilla’s motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court concluded that adding Texas defendants destroyed complete diversity and held that it could not decide the defendants’ pending motions to dismiss before resolving the jurisdictional issue. The case was remanded to the Circuit Court of Frederick County, and the motions to dismiss were denied as moot.

Holdings

  1. The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the addition of Dushawn Nelson and DCAA Trucking, Inc., both Texas citizens, destroyed complete diversity with Quintanilla, also a Texas citizen; the action therefore had to be remanded to state court.
  2. The court could not decide the motions to dismiss before resolving the jurisdictional defect because subject matter jurisdiction is an absolute prerequisite to exercising federal judicial power.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the federal court retained diversity subject matter jurisdiction after the amended complaint added Texas defendants who shared citizenship with Quintanilla.
  2. Whether the court should decide the newly added defendants' motions to dismiss before resolving the jurisdictional motion to remand.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (15)

  • Sherr v. S.C. Elec. & Gas Co., 180 F. Supp. 3d 407, 413 n.2 (D.S.C. 2016)(followed)
  • BGC Partners Inc. v. Avison Young (Canada) Inc., No. 2:15-CV-02057-DCN, 2015 WL 7458593, at *1 n.2 (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2015)(followed)
  • Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994)(followed)
  • Yarnevic v. Brink's, Inc., 102 F.3d 753, 754 (4th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Palisades Collections LLC v. Shorts, 552 F.3d 327, 336 (4th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Co., 29 F.3d 148, 151 (4th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Mayes v. Rapoport, 198 F.3d 457, 461 (4th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Al-Suyid v. Hifter, 139 F.4th 368, 378 (4th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 514 (1868)(followed)
  • Mayor & Aldermen of City of Nashville v. Cooper, 73 U.S. 247, 250 (1867)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…