Timothy W. v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Civil Action No. 6:25-CV-00008 · United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Lynchburg Division · February 2, 2026 · No. 6:25-CV-00008

Summary

A United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in a Social Security disability benefits action. The magistrate judge concludes that the administrative law judge's decision finding Timothy W. not disabled and denying disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is supported by substantial evidence, and recommends affirmance by the presiding district judge.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge concluded that substantial evidence supported the ALJ's determination that Timothy was not disabled and recommended affirming the Commissioner's final decision.
  2. The magistrate judge concluded that the ALJ appropriately considered and evaluated Timothy's testimony and reasonably found that it was only partially consistent with the record.
  3. The magistrate judge concluded that remand was not warranted because the ALJ's discussion was sufficiently comprehensive and provided a logical bridge from the evidence to the conclusions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Timothy was not disabled.
  2. Whether the ALJ adequately considered and evaluated Timothy's testimony concerning the intensity, persistence, and limiting effects of his symptoms.
  3. Whether the ALJ adequately explained the residual functional capacity assessment and reconciled conflicting evidence.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (26)

  • Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 654 n.1 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458, 460-62 (1983)(followed)
  • Oakes v. Kijakazi, 70 F.4th 207, 211 (4th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Berryhill, 858 F.3d 858, 861 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Taylor v. Weinberger, 512 F.2d 664, 666 (4th Cir. 1975)(followed)
  • Drumgold v. Commissioner of Social Security, 144 F.4th 596, 605 & n.9, 605-06 (4th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 636, 639-40 (4th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Arakas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 983 F.3d 83, 94-95 (4th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Mastro v. Apfel, 270 F.3d 171, 176 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…