Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia addresses several motions in Michael Paul Addison’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action concerning alleged chemical-gas use, strip-cell placement, and failure to intervene. The court grants Defendant Hale’s motion to dismiss, denies Addison’s motion for default judgment against Defendant Gill, grants Gill’s motion for an extension of time, and grants Addison leave in part to amend his complaint. The court reserves ruling on Gill’s motion to dismiss pending the filing of an amended complaint.
Holdings
- A plaintiff who has not first sought or obtained a clerk's entry of default under Rule 55(a) may be denied default judgment under Rule 55(b).
- A court may extend an expired deadline under Rule 6(b)(1)(B) when the failure to act resulted from excusable neglect, considering prejudice, delay, the reason for delay, and good faith.
- Leave to amend was properly denied as to amendment before resolution of Hale's motion because of undue delay and prejudice, but granted as to amendment concerning Gill because the motion was timely in context and futility could not be determined with certainty.
- Plaintiff failed to state a plausible § 1983 failure-to-intervene claim against Hale because he did not allege facts showing that Hale knew Gill was violating Plaintiff's constitutional rights or had a reasonable opportunity to prevent the subsequent harm.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to default judgment against Gill when he had not first obtained a clerk's entry of default under Rule 55(a).
- Whether Gill demonstrated excusable neglect warranting an extension of time to respond to the complaint.
- Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to amend his complaint under Rule 15(a).
- Whether Plaintiff stated a plausible Eighth Amendment failure-to-intervene claim against Hale under § 1983.
- Whether the court should rule on Gill's motion to dismiss before Plaintiff filed the permitted amended complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (24)
- Shelton v. Marshall, 724 F. Supp. 3d 532, 540 (W.D. Va. 2024)(followed)
- Hummel v. Hall, 868 F. Supp. 2d 543, 547 (W.D. Va. 2012)(followed)
- Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778, 780 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Worsham v. Travel Options, Inc., 678 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. Pernites, 200 F. App'x 257, 258 (4th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Worthington v. Rice, No. 3:16-CV-61, 2016 WL 9331275, at *1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 19, 2016)(followed)
- Green v. Sanchez, No. 2:21-CV-01376-RMG, 2022 WL 2785848, at *1 (D.S.C. June 22, 2022)(followed)
- Eagle Fire, Inc. v. Eagle Integrated Controls, Inc., No. 3:06cv264, 2006 WL 1720681, at *5 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2006)(followed)
- Colleton Preparatory Acad., Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc., 616 F.3d 413, 417 (4th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Smith v. Montalvan, 723 F. Supp. 3d 454, 462–63 (E.D. Va. 2024)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…