Summary
The court granted the parties’ stipulated motion extending the deadlines for the defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint and for related opposition and reply filings. The court denied as moot the defendants’ motion to dismiss the original complaint because the First Amended Complaint superseded it and directed the clerk to terminate that motion.
Holdings
- The court granted the parties' stipulated motion and extended the defendants' deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint through January 26, 2026, with corresponding opposition and reply deadlines.
- Because the First Amended Complaint completely superseded the original complaint, the defendants' motion to dismiss the original complaint was denied as moot.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause supported extending the defendants' deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint.
- Whether the defendants' motion to dismiss the original complaint remained operative after the First Amended Complaint was filed.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…