Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington confirms a previously granted 90-day continuance of the pretrial and trial deadlines and denies further modification of the scheduling order. The court also declines to impose sanctions, re-notes all currently pending motions to December 15, 2025, and directs the parties to refrain from filing further motions until the court decides the cross-motions for summary judgment.
Holdings
- Good cause supported continuing the trial and pretrial deadlines for 90 days because the court needed uninterrupted time to resolve the numerous pending motions and supplemental briefing.
- The court declined to make any further modification to the scheduling order and left the order granting the 90-day continuance in effect.
- Sanctions were unwarranted under the circumstances presented, so Plaintiff's request for sanctions was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause supported continuing the pretrial and trial deadlines for 90 days.
- Whether the scheduling order should be modified again to shorten or otherwise alter the continuance.
- Whether Defendants should be sanctioned for their handling of the continuance motion.
- How the pending motions should be re-noted in light of the completed briefing.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592 n.10 (1993)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…