Gary Levy v. Google LLC

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington denies Gary Levy’s motion for reconsideration of an order accepting his untimely response to Google LLC’s motion for summary judgment. The court finds no manifest error, new circumstances, or intervening change in law, accepts one exhibit as timely, rejects later untimely submissions, and declines to grant further extensions.

Holdings

1. Reconsideration was unwarranted because Levy did not identify manifest error, present qualifying new circumstances or legal authority, or show an intervening change in law.
2. The exhibit filed on November 19, 2025 was timely, but the submissions filed between November 20 and December 1, 2025 were untimely and would not be considered in response to the court's prior order or Google's summary-judgment motion.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Levy demonstrated manifest error, new facts, or intervening legal authority warranting reconsideration of the court's November 18, 2025 order.
2. Whether Levy's November 19 exhibit and later submissions were timely and should be considered in connection with Google's motion for summary judgment.

Disposition

denied