Tra Bi Jean v. Pamela Bondi, et al.

Jean · United States District Court for the Western District of Washington · December 5, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-02487

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington grants Tra Bi Jean’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order in his habeas proceedings. The order prohibits immigration authorities from transferring him from the Northwest Immigration and Customs Enforcement Processing Center during the proceedings, subject to specified exceptions, and expires on December 19, 2025 unless extended.

Holdings

  1. A federal district court may use its authority under the All Writs Act and its inherent authority to protect the integrity of habeas proceedings by prohibiting the government from transferring a petitioner outside the district while those proceedings are pending.
  2. Petitioner satisfied the requirements for a temporary restraining order by showing a likelihood of success on the merits, imminent irreparable harm, and that the balance of hardships and public interest favored relief.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Petitioner was entitled to an ex parte temporary restraining order preventing Respondents from transferring him from the Northwest Immigration and Customs Enforcement Processing Center during the habeas proceedings.
  2. Whether Petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on his claim that he was subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2), and therefore was entitled to consideration for release on bond.
  3. Whether the threatened transfer would cause imminent irreparable harm by impairing Petitioner's access to counsel and participation in bond hearings.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (11)

  • Ozturk v. Trump, 779 F. Supp. 3d 462, 496 (D. Vt. 2025), amended sub nom. Ozturk v. Hyde, 136 F.4th 382 (2d Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Oliveros v. Kaiser, No. 25-CV-07117-BLF, 2025 WL 2677125, at *8–9 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 18, 2025)(followed)
  • Reyna ex rel. J.F.G. v. Hott, 921 F.3d 204, 209 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)(followed)
  • United States v. City of Seattle, 474 F. Supp. 3d 1181, 1185, 1185–87 (W.D. Wash. 2020)(followed)
  • Drakes Bay Oyster Co. v. Jewell, 747 F.3d 1073, 1092 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Fraihat v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, 16 F.4th 613, 635 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1135 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, 2025 WL 3289861, at *10–11 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2025)(followed)
  • L.A.E. v. Wamsley, No. 3:25-CV-01975-AN, 2025 WL 3037856, at *5 (D. Or. Oct. 30, 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…