Aman Poya v. Kristi Noem et al.

No. C25-2576JLR (W.D. Wash. Jan. 29, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Washington · January 29, 2026 · No. C25-2576JLR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington grants Aman Poya’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court concludes that his prolonged mandatory immigration detention requires an individualized bond hearing under the Due Process Clause and orders Respondents to conduct the hearing within 14 calendar days. The court declines to reach claims concerning potential third-country removal because those claims are not ripe.

Holdings

  1. Poya's detention had become unreasonable, and due process required the government to provide him with a bond hearing.
  2. Poya's claims based on the possibility of removal to a third country were not ripe for review.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Poya's prolonged mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b), without a bond hearing, had become unreasonable and violated the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
  2. Whether the court should require the government to provide Poya with a bond hearing and release him if the hearing was not timely conducted.
  3. Whether Poya's claims concerning possible removal to a third country were ripe for judicial review.

Disposition

granted

Cases Cited (9)

  • Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 297, 303 (2018)(followed)
  • Padilla v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, 704 F. Supp. 3d 1163, 1168 (W.D. Wash. 2023)(followed)
  • Rodriguez v. Marin, 909 F.3d 252, 256 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Toktosunov v. Wamsley, C25-1724TL, 2025 WL 3492858, at *4, *6 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 5, 2025)(followed)
  • Banda v. McAleenan, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1099, 1117, 1120 (W.D. Wash. 2019)(followed)
  • Jamal A. v. Whitaker, 358 F. Supp. 3d 853, 858-59 (D. Minn. 2019)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 689 (2001)(followed)
  • Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., 473 U.S. 568, 580 (1985)(followed)
  • Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission, 220 F.3d 1134, 1138 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…