Eritrean Association of Greater Seattle v. Henock Teckle Gebrekidan et al.

No. 3:24-cv-05517-DGE (W.D. Wash. Jan. 5, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Washington · January 5, 2026 · No. 3:24-cv-05517-DGE

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Plaintiff’s motion to approve alternative delivery methods for a third-party subpoena. The Court authorized delivery by regular and certified U.S. mail, leaving copies at the nonparty witness’s residence, and emailing copies to the witness and his former attorney after finding that personal-service attempts had been diligent and that the alternative methods were reasonably calculated to provide notice and an opportunity to object.

Holdings

  1. A district court may authorize substitute service of a Rule 45 subpoena when the serving party presents sufficient evidence of diligent attempts at personal service and the alternative method is reasonably calculated to provide timely, fair notice and an opportunity to object or move to quash.
  2. Regular and certified U.S. mail, leaving copies at the witness's residence, and email, used together, were reasonably calculated under the circumstances to provide Gebregiorgis with notice and an opportunity to object or move to quash the subpoena.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could authorize alternative service of a third-party subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(b)(1) after diligent but unsuccessful attempts at personal service.
  2. Whether service by regular and certified U.S. mail, leaving copies at the witness's residence, and email would be reasonably calculated to provide timely, fair notice and an opportunity to object or move to quash.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Wyo Tech Inv. Grp. LLC, No. CV-17-04140-PHX-DWL, 2019 WL 3208114 (D. Ariz. July 16, 2019)(followed in part)
  • Fujikura Ltd. v. Finisar Corp., Case No. 15-mc-80110-HRL (JSC), 2015 WL 5782351 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2015)(followed)
  • Kleiman v. Wright, Case No. 2:20-cv-00593-BJR, 2020 WL 2107710 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 24, 2020)(analogized)
  • Kantor v. Big Tip Inc., 2:15-cv-01871-RAJ, 2017 WL 2634207 (W.D. Wash. June 19, 2017)(analogized)
  • Tubar v. Clift, Case No. C05-1154-JCC, 2007 WL 214260 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 25, 2007)(analogized)
  • Toni Brattin & Co., Inc. v. Mosaic Int'l, LLC, Case No. 15-mc-80090-MEJ, 2015 WL 1844056 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2015)(followed in part)
  • Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp., Case No. SA CV 11-1733 FMO (JCGx), 2016 WL 9451361 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2016)(analogized)
  • Wyo Tech, 2019 WL 3208114(distinguished)
  • Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950)(followed)
  • Prima Air Grp. LLC v. Prero, Case No. 2:23-cv-09773-FLA-SSC, 2025 WL 1416230 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2025)(analogized)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…