Shaun Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

No. 2:23-cv-672-RSM (W.D. Wash. Jan. 15, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Washington · January 15, 2026 · No. 2:23-cv-672-RSM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Plaintiff Shaun Williams’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court awarded Plaintiff’s counsel $21,925.05 from past-due Social Security benefits, subject to applicable processing fees, and noted the required treatment of the prior EAJA fee award.

Holdings

  1. A court may award a reasonable fee to counsel who represented a successful Social Security Title II claimant before the court, subject to the requirements and limits of 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
  2. The requested § 406(b) fee was permissible because it was reasonable and did not exceed 25 percent of the claimant's total past-due benefits.
  3. Fees may be awarded under both the EAJA and § 406(b), but counsel must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff's counsel was entitled to a reasonable attorney-fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
  2. Whether the requested fee complied with the statutory limitation that a § 406(b) fee not exceed 25 percent of the claimant's past-due benefits.
  3. How the § 406(b) award should be reconciled with the prior EAJA fee award.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Straw v. Bowen, 866 F.2d 1167 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Stenswick v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…