Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin screened Sammie L. Smith’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint concerning the handling of inmate grievances by correctional complaint examiners. The court held that the allegations did not state claims for denial of grievance-related rights, retaliation, due process, or failure to investigate. The complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and Smith was granted until May 12, 2026, to file an amended complaint.
Holdings
- The rejection or denial of inmate grievances, without more, does not state a First Amendment claim because the First Amendment right to petition the government does not guarantee a particular result.
- Smith failed to state a First Amendment retaliation claim because he did not allege that he engaged in protected activity concerning Leiser before Leiser allegedly made the retaliatory statement.
- Smith failed to state a due process claim because he had no protected interest in legal-loan resources.
- An inmate's allegation that a prison official failed to investigate another official's conduct does not, by itself, state a constitutional claim.
- The alleged mishandling, failure to process, or discarding of inmate grievances did not state a constitutional claim where the defendants did not cause or participate in the underlying misconduct and the alleged conduct was not sufficiently deterrent to support retaliation.
Questions Presented
- Whether rejecting or denying Smith's inmate grievances stated a First Amendment claim.
- Whether Leiser's alleged statement that Smith was ineligible for a legal loan stated a First Amendment retaliation claim.
- Whether the alleged denial of legal-loan resources stated a due process claim.
- Whether Baranowski's failure to investigate Leiser stated a constitutional claim.
- Whether the alleged mishandling or nonprocessing of Smith's grievances stated a First Amendment retaliation or other constitutional claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (9)
- Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 521 (1972)(followed)
- Brewer v. Ray, No. 04-C-957-S, 2005 WL 1532599, at *2 (W.D. Wis. June 29, 2005), aff'd, 181 F. App'x 563 (7th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Bridges v. Gilbert, 557 F.3d 541, 546, 551 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Leitgen v. Franciscan Skemp Healthcare, Inc., 630 F.3d 668, 676 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Williams v. Titlbach, No. 21-CV-500-WMC, 2022 WL 179340, at *2 (W.D. Wis. Jan. 20, 2022)(followed)
- Wilkins v. Illinois Department of Corrections, 2009 WL 1904414, at *9 (S.D. Ill. July 1, 2009)(followed)
- Owens v. Hinsley, 635 F.3d 950, 953-954 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Smith v. Butler, No. 17-CV-189-MJR, 2017 WL 1318270, at *7 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 10, 2017)(followed)
- Felton v. City of Chicago, 827 F.3d 632, 636 (7th Cir. 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…