Summary
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation orders the centralization of actions arising from the PowerSchool customer data security breach. The Panel transfers the actions listed on Schedule A to the Southern District of California and assigns them to Judge Roger T. Benitez for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The order identifies common factual and legal issues, including data-security practices, breach notification, negligence, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment.
Holdings
- The actions listed on Schedule A involve common questions of fact and should be centralized for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
- The Southern District of California is an appropriate transferee district for the centralized litigation.
- Informal coordination was not shown to be the most efficient method for resolving the litigation, so it did not preclude centralization.
Questions Presented
- Whether the related actions involve common questions of fact warranting centralization under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.
- Whether centralization in the Southern District of California would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.
- Whether informal coordination was a more efficient alternative to multidistrict centralization.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- In re StockX Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 412 F. Supp. 3d 1363 (J.P.M.L. 2019)(distinguished)
- In re [24]7.AI, Inc., Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 338 F. Supp. 3d 1345 (J.P.M.L. 2018)(distinguished)
- In re Hudson's Bay Co. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 326 F. Supp. 3d 1372 (J.P.M.L. 2018)(distinguished)
- In re Best Buy Co., Cal. Song-Beverly Credit Card Act Litig., 804 F. Supp. 2d 1376 (J.P.M.L. 2011)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…