State v. Keith

2026 UT App 51 · Court of Appeals of Utah · April 2, 2026 · No. 20241179-CA

Summary

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a restitution order against Shawna Jo Keith following her conviction for making a false credit report in connection with a vehicle purchase. The court held that the dealership's pecuniary loss could be measured by the vehicle's $19,063 contract price rather than the $6,500 wholesale acquisition cost because the loss arose from a completed, fraud-induced sale with a definite payment obligation.

Holdings

  1. When a defendant's criminal conduct causes the loss of a completed retail transaction supported by a contract establishing a definite payment obligation, the contract price may be an appropriate measure of the victim's actual pecuniary damages, rather than the seller's wholesale acquisition cost.
  2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering restitution of $19,063, the vehicle's contract purchase price.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court used the proper measure of pecuniary damages in ordering restitution.
  2. Whether, under the particular circumstances of a fraud-induced completed retail sale, restitution could be measured by the contract purchase price rather than the dealership's wholesale acquisition cost.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (7)

  • State v. Ludlow, 2015 UT App 146, 353 P.3d 179(followed)
  • State v. Blake, 2025 UT 21, 582 P.3d 705(followed)
  • State v. Corbitt, 2003 UT App 417, 82 P.3d 211(followed)
  • Mahana v. Onyx Acceptance Corp., 2004 UT 59, 96 P.3d 893(followed)
  • State v. Irwin, 2016 UT App 144, 379 P.3d 68(distinguished)
  • State v. Debrok, 2025 UT 40, 579 P.3d 296(acknowledged)
  • State v. Sabbagh, 2019 UT App 179, 454 P.3d 70(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…