Summary
The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a restitution order against Shawna Jo Keith following her conviction for making a false credit report in connection with a vehicle purchase. The court held that the dealership's pecuniary loss could be measured by the vehicle's $19,063 contract price rather than the $6,500 wholesale acquisition cost because the loss arose from a completed, fraud-induced sale with a definite payment obligation.
Holdings
- When a defendant's criminal conduct causes the loss of a completed retail transaction supported by a contract establishing a definite payment obligation, the contract price may be an appropriate measure of the victim's actual pecuniary damages, rather than the seller's wholesale acquisition cost.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering restitution of $19,063, the vehicle's contract purchase price.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court used the proper measure of pecuniary damages in ordering restitution.
- Whether, under the particular circumstances of a fraud-induced completed retail sale, restitution could be measured by the contract purchase price rather than the dealership's wholesale acquisition cost.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- State v. Ludlow, 2015 UT App 146, 353 P.3d 179(followed)
- State v. Blake, 2025 UT 21, 582 P.3d 705(followed)
- State v. Corbitt, 2003 UT App 417, 82 P.3d 211(followed)
- Mahana v. Onyx Acceptance Corp., 2004 UT 59, 96 P.3d 893(followed)
- State v. Irwin, 2016 UT App 144, 379 P.3d 68(distinguished)
- State v. Debrok, 2025 UT 40, 579 P.3d 296(acknowledged)
- State v. Sabbagh, 2019 UT App 179, 454 P.3d 70(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…