State of Utah v. Anna Marie Morgan

34 P.3d 767 (Utah 2001) · Supreme Court of Utah · October 19, 2001 · No. No. 20000257

Summary

The Supreme Court of Utah held that a prosecutor's innocent miscalculation of the evidence needed to establish probable cause at a preliminary hearing may constitute "other good cause" permitting refiling of dismissed criminal charges. The court concluded that the State's failure to call a qualified officer at the first hearing did not violate the defendant's due process rights because there was no forum shopping, harassment, or withholding of evidence. The court reversed the Utah Court of Appeals and reinstated Anna Marie Morgan's convictions.

Holdings

  1. Under the Utah Constitution's due process guarantee, refiling a charge dismissed for insufficient evidence is permissible when the State shows new or previously unavailable evidence or other good cause, provided refiling does not involve prosecutorial harassment, forum shopping, withholding of evidence, or other fundamental unfairness.
  2. An innocent miscalculation by the prosecutor of the quantum of evidence necessary to obtain a bindover constitutes other good cause that may justify refiling, even when the additional evidence was known and available at the first preliminary hearing.
  3. The State's refiling did not violate Morgan's due process rights because the prosecutor's failure to call the second officer was an innocent miscalculation, the second hearing was held before the same magistrate, and the State did not engage in forum shopping, harassment, or withholding of evidence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the State could dismiss and refile the drug-distribution charge after the first preliminary hearing resulted in a reduced bindover for insufficient evidence.
  2. Whether the prosecutor's failure to call a qualified officer who was present and available at the first preliminary hearing constituted an innocent miscalculation and therefore other good cause justifying refiling under State v. Brickey.
  3. Whether refiling violated Morgan's due process rights by constituting prosecutorial harassment, forum shopping, withholding of evidence, or another form of fundamental unfairness.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (16)

  • State v. Morgan, 2000 UT App. 48, 997 P.2d 910(reversed)
  • State v. Larsen, 865 P.2d 1355, 1357 (Utah 1993)(followed)
  • State v. Brickey, 714 P.2d 644, 646-48 (Utah 1986)(interpreted and extended)
  • Jones v. State, 481 P.2d 169, 171 (Okla. Ct. App. 1971)(followed)
  • State v. Fisk, 966 P.2d 860, 864 (Utah Ct. App. 1998)(followed)
  • Harper v. District Court, 484 P.2d 891, 897 (Okla. 1971)(adopted in part)
  • State v. Elling, 19 Ariz. App. 317, 506 P.2d 1102, 1103 (1973)(persuasive)
  • People v. Sabell, 708 P.2d 463, 466 (Colo. 1985)(persuasive)
  • State v. Bacon, 117 Idaho 679, 791 P.2d 429, 433-34 (1990)(persuasive)
  • Stockwell v. State, 98 Idaho 797, 573 P.2d 116, 126 (1977)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…