Summary
Hector Eduardo Reyes appealed his fifteen-years-to-life sentence following his guilty plea to rape of a child. The court rejected his challenges to the sentence, his claim that the sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment, and his claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. The sentence was affirmed, and appointed counsel's motion to withdraw was granted.
Holdings
- The district court had an ample basis for imposing the fifteen-years-to-life sentence, and the sentencing challenge was meritless.
- A fifteen-year minimum sentence and potential life sentence for the aggravated rape of a child did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
- Reyes failed to establish ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
- Reyes failed to establish ineffective assistance of appellate counsel because he did not show that counsel's Anders brief prejudiced him or prevented him from raising a meritorious argument.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by sentencing Reyes to fifteen years to life.
- Whether the sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment.
- Whether Reyes's trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.
- Whether Reyes's appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by filing an Anders brief and moving to withdraw.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967)(followed)
- State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168, 170 (Utah 1981)(followed)
- State v. Herrera, 1999 UT 64, ¶¶ 31-33, 993 P.2d 854(followed)
- State v. Gardner, 947 P.2d 630, 633 (Utah 1997)(followed)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)(followed)
- State v. Arguelles, 921 P.2d 439, 441 (Utah 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…