Summary
The Supreme Court of Utah held that the federal Religious Peyote Exemption in 21 C.F.R. § 1307.31 is incorporated into the Utah Controlled Substances Act. The court concluded that the exemption applies by its plain language to members of the Native American Church without regard to membership in a federally recognized tribe. The court reversed the district court and remanded for reconsideration of the defendants' motion to dismiss.
Holdings
- Utah law incorporates the federal exemption for the religious use of peyote in bona fide ceremonies of the Native American Church because the exemption is a specific exception to peyote's classification as a controlled substance under Utah Code section 58-37-4(2)(a)(iii).
- The federal exemption applies to all members of the Native American Church who use peyote in bona fide religious ceremonies; it does not, on its face, require membership in a federally recognized tribe.
- A Utah court is not required to defer to a federal agency's interpretation of a federal regulation incorporated into Utah law, particularly where the agency interpretation conflicts with the regulation's plain language and raises due process concerns.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Utah Controlled Substances Act incorporates the federal Religious Peyote Exemption in 21 C.F.R. § 1307.31.
- Whether the federal exemption protects members of the Native American Church who use peyote in bona fide religious ceremonies without regard to membership in a federally recognized Native American tribe.
- Whether the court should defer to the DEA's asserted interpretation limiting the exemption to members of federally recognized tribes.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (20)
- Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Thornburgh, 922 F.2d 1210, 1212 (5th Cir. 1991)(discussed)
- United States v. Boyll, 774 F. Supp. 1333, 1335, 1338 (D.N.M. 1991)(followed)
- Native Am. Church v. United States, 468 F. Supp. 1247, 1248-49 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)(discussed)
- Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 878-80, 890 (1990)(discussed)
- Ward v. Richfield City, 798 P.2d 757, 759 (Utah 1990)(followed)
- Dick Simon Trucking, Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n, 2004 UT 11, ¶ 17, 84 P.3d 1197(followed)
- State v. Mohi, 901 P.2d 991, 1009 (Utah 1995)(followed)
- Provo City Corp. v. State, 795 P.2d 1120, 1125 (Utah 1990)(followed)
- State v. Lindquist, 674 P.2d 1234, 1237 (Utah 1983)(followed)
- Ray v. Atl. Richfield Co., 435 U.S. 151, 158 (1978)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…