Summary
The Utah Supreme Court held that the district court prematurely dismissed Wintergreen Group's state and federal inverse condemnation claims based on the consolidation of UDOT's direct condemnation actions. The court vacated the dismissal and remanded for consideration of whether the constitutional claims should proceed as a counterclaim or independent action, along with other unresolved issues.
Holdings
- The district court erred by dismissing Wintergreen's inverse-condemnation claims solely because UDOT had filed direct condemnation actions that were later consolidated. At the motion-to-dismiss stage, Wintergreen was entitled to develop its claims and attempt to show that the constitutional claims were independently viable.
- A constitutional cause of action cannot be preempted by a statute merely because the statute codifies or provides procedures for enforcing the constitutional right. The constitutional claim is presumptively superior to a conflicting or incomplete statutory formulation.
- The district court could not dismiss the § 1983 claims on the ground that a comprehensive statutory scheme automatically preempted them. To foreclose a § 1983 remedy, the defendant must establish that Congress expressly withdrew the remedy or that allowing the action would be inconsistent with a carefully tailored congressional scheme.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court improperly dismissed Wintergreen's inverse-condemnation claims at the pleading stage on the ground that the consolidated direct-condemnation action preempted or functionally absorbed those claims.
- Whether Wintergreen sufficiently pleaded that the direct-condemnation process might be unavailable or inadequate to provide the full compensation required by the state and federal constitutions.
- Whether a statutory condemnation scheme can preempt a constitutional cause of action merely because it provides an enforcement mechanism for the same constitutional right.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (8)
- Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc., 2004 UT 101, ¶ 9, 104 P.3d 1226(followed)
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 194-97 (1985)(followed)
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986, 1013, 1018 & n.21 (1984)(followed)
- Ivers v. Utah Department of Transportation, 2007 UT 19, ¶ 8, 154 P.3d 802(followed)
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Association, 453 U.S. 1, 20 (1981)(followed)
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103, 106-07 (1989)(followed)
- Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992, 1012 (1984)(followed)
- Wright v. Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418, 423-24 (1987)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…