Summary
The Utah Supreme Court affirmed a judgment awarding Frank Kristensen treble damages, attorney fees, and costs against Yvonne Martin for unlawful detainer. The court held that temporary possession orders entered in the divorce proceeding protected Martin from eviction during the litigation but did not preclude statutory unlawful-detainer remedies upon a final judgment. The court also concluded that Martin's prolonged possession after expiration of a five-day notice supported the damages award under Utah's unlawful-detainer statute.
Holdings
- Temporary possession orders entered in a divorce proceeding function like temporary possession orders in an unlawful-detainer proceeding: they protect the tenant from eviction during the litigation but do not foreclose the landlord's statutory remedies if the landlord ultimately obtains a final judgment for unlawful detainer.
- When a tenant is found to have committed unlawful detainer, Utah Code section 78B-6-811 mandates an award of three times the assessed damages and reasonable attorney fees; a prior temporary possession order does not eliminate or suspend those remedies.
- The court may not override or reduce the statutorily mandated treble damages on public-policy or equitable grounds.
Questions Presented
- Whether temporary possession orders entered in a divorce proceeding made Martin's continued possession lawful in a manner that foreclosed Frank's statutory remedies for unlawful detainer.
- Whether temporary possession orders precluded the accrual or award of treble damages and other statutory remedies for unlawful detainer.
- Whether equitable or public-policy considerations authorized the court to withhold or reduce the statutorily mandated treble damages.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Utah Optical Co. v. Keith, 56 P. 155, 158 (Utah 1899)(followed)
- Est. of Faucheaux v. City of Provo, 2019 UT 41, ¶ 9, 449 P.3d 112(followed)
- Manzanares v. Byington (In re Adoption of Baby B.), 2012 UT 35, ¶ 41, 308 P.3d 382(followed)
- Martin v. Kristensen, 2019 UT App 127, ¶¶ 37-40, 450 P.3d 66(affirmed)
- Osguthorpe v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C., 2010 UT 29, ¶¶ 22-23, 232 P.3d 999(followed)
- Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, Chartered, 681 P.2d 1258, 1262 (Utah 1984)(followed)
- Buchanan v. Crites, 150 P.2d 100, 102 (Utah 1944)(followed)
- Carteri v. Roberts, 73 P. 818, 819 (Cal. 1903)(followed)
- Coinmach (Vending) Corp. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909, 915 (Tex. 2013)(followed)
- Valley Lane Corp. v. Bowen, 592 P.2d 589, 592 (Utah 1979)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…