PE1 Housing LP v. Cheryl Damon

PE1 Housing · Vermont Superior Court, Civil Division, Windham Unit · April 16, 2026 · No. 25-CV-05466

Summary

The Vermont Superior Court, Windham Civil Division, dismissed an ejectment action for nonpayment of rent because the complaint did not attach all documents comprising the rental agreement. The court held that 12 V.S.A. § 4852 requires attachment of the rental agreement in effect and applicable to the case, including relevant addenda, and concluded that the omitted Low Income Lease Rider and House Rules were potentially material. The order was electronically signed on March 30, 2026.

Holdings

  1. An ejectment complaint must attach the rental agreement in effect and applicable to the case, including required addenda or attachments that are part of that agreement.
  2. When a required addendum or attachment forming part of the rental agreement is omitted from the complaint, the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that the omitted document has no relevance to the proceeding.
  3. The complaint was statutorily defective and the ejectment proceeding had to be dismissed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an ejectment complaint complies with 12 V.S.A. § 4852 when it attaches the principal lease and some addenda but omits other documents that form part of the rental agreement.
  2. Whether Plaintiff established that the omitted Low Income Lease Rider and House Rules were irrelevant to the eviction proceeding.
  3. Whether the complaint should be dismissed for failure to comply with the statutory attachment requirement.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Vermont Small Bus. Dev. Corp. v. Fifth Son Corp., 2013 VT 7, ¶ 15(followed)
  • In re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26, ¶ 14(followed)
  • Jacobs v. Holden Leonard Co., 110 Vt. 245, 250 (1939)(followed)
  • Deblasio v. Hathaway, 2026 WL 491054, at *2 (Vt. Super. Ct., Chitt. Civ. Div. Feb. 11, 2026)(followed)
  • Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)(followed)
  • Central Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Town of Springfield, 135 Vt. 436, 439 (1977)(followed)
  • Woodford v. Phillips, 2023 WL 9507837, at *1 (Vt. Super. Ct., Winds. Civ. Div. Nov. 28, 2023)(followed)
  • Mad Partners, LLC v. Fifth Son Corp., 2012 WL 8899890, at *2 (Vt. Super. Ct. Wash. Civ. Div. Apr. 12, 2012)(followed)
  • Quenneville v. Buttolph, 2003 VT 82, ¶ 16(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…