Summary
The Vermont Supreme Court reviewed a $2,000 sanction imposed on defense counsel Duncan Kilmartin for filing confidential mediation materials with the trial court. The court held that sanctions based on the court's inherent powers required a finding of bad faith and that counsel lacked fair warning that his disclosure, which he claimed was required by professional-responsibility rules, could result in a punitive sanction. The court reversed and remanded for a determination of Kilmartin's motivation.
Holdings
- A finding of bad faith is essential to the court's inherent power to impose the punitive sanction imposed here; the superior court erred by imposing the sanction without finding improper motive or bad faith.
- An attorney may not receive a punitive sanction without fair warning that the conduct could subject the attorney to that sanction; a finding of bad faith would have addressed the lack of fair warning in these circumstances.
- The superior court erred by ignoring Kilmartin's asserted justification for disclosure and by failing to determine whether he acted from an improper motive or in bad faith.
Questions Presented
- Whether a court may impose a punitive monetary sanction under its inherent powers for disclosure of confidential mediation materials without finding bad faith.
- Whether due process requires fair warning that the conduct may subject an attorney to a punitive sanction.
- Whether Kilmartin's asserted duty to report opposing counsel's possible misconduct required consideration before sanctions were imposed.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (13)
- In re Anderson, ___ Vt. ___, 769 A.2d 1282 (2000) (mem.)(cited)
- Van Eps v. Johnston, 150 Vt. 324, 326-27, 553 A.2d 1089, 1091-92 (1988)(cited)
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 764, 767, 100 S. Ct. 2455, 65 L. Ed. 2d 488 (1980)(cited)
- In re Sherman Hollow, Inc., 160 Vt. 627, 630, 641 A.2d 753, 756 (1993) (mem.)(cited)
- Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 53-54, 111 S. Ct. 2123, 115 L. Ed. 2d 27 (1991)(cited)
- In re Paschal, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 483, 491, 19 L. Ed. 992 (1870)(cited)
- State v. Pownal Tanning Co., 142 Vt. 601, 605, 459 A.2d 989, 991 (1983)(cited)
- Rich v. Montpelier Supervisory Dist., 167 Vt. 415, 420, 709 A.2d 501, 504 (1998)(cited)
- Bigelow v. Bigelow, 171 Vt. ___, 759 A.2d 67, 72-73 (2000)(cited)
- Mackler Prods., Inc. v. Cohen, 146 F.3d 126, 129-30 (2d Cir. 1998)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…