Sarvis v. Vermont State Colleges, 172 Vt. 76

772 A.2d 494 (2001) · Supreme Court of Vermont · March 2, 2001 · No. No. 99-390

Summary

The Supreme Court of Vermont affirmed summary judgment for Vermont State Colleges after it terminated Robert Sarvis's employment contracts based on misrepresentations about his work history and concealment of his criminal conviction and incarceration. The court held that fraudulent inducement during the hiring process may support rescission and constitute just cause for termination. It also held that criminal history alone is not a protected category under Title VII absent discrimination based on race or another protected characteristic.

Holdings

  1. Misrepresentation during the hiring process can constitute misconduct sufficient to support a just-cause dismissal when the employee fraudulently induced the employer to enter the employment contract.
  2. An employer induced to enter employment contracts by the employee's fraudulent misrepresentations may rescind the contracts and avoid liability for breach; the same misrepresentations may support just-cause termination.
  3. Title VII does not make criminal history, standing alone, a protected class or status and does not prohibit termination based solely on criminal history absent discrimination based on race or another protected characteristic.
  4. Summary judgment for Vermont State Colleges was proper because the material facts were undisputed and the employer was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the contract and Title VII claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Sarvis's preemployment misrepresentations and concealment of his incarceration and work history constituted misconduct and just cause for terminating his definite-term employment contracts.
  2. Whether fraudulent inducement entitled Vermont State Colleges to rescind or avoid liability under the employment contracts.
  3. Whether Title VII protects an employee from termination based solely on criminal history unrelated to a protected characteristic.
  4. Whether summary judgment was proper on Sarvis's contract and Title VII claims.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (24)

  • In re Towle, 164 Vt. 145, 665 A.2d 55 (1995)(applied)
  • City of St. Albans v. Northwest Regional Planning Commission, 167 Vt. 466, 708 A.2d 194 (1998)(applied)
  • Viles v. Vermont State Colleges, 168 Vt. 459, 724 A.2d 448 (1998)(applied)
  • City of Burlington v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., 163 Vt. 124, 655 A.2d 719 (1994)(applied)
  • Lambert v. Equinox House, Inc., 126 Vt. 229, 227 A.2d 403 (1967)(applied)
  • Nadeau v. Imtec, Inc., 164 Vt. 471, 670 A.2d 841 (1995)(applied)
  • In re Graves, 147 Vt. 519, 520 A.2d 999 (1986)(applied)
  • Genier v. Department of Employment Security, 140 Vt. 453, 438 A.2d 1116 (1981)(followed)
  • Negyessy v. Strong, 136 Vt. 193, 388 A.2d 383 (1978)(applied)
  • Smith v. DeMetre, 119 Vt. 73, 118 A.2d 346 (1955)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…