In re PRB Docket No. 2006-167, 2007 VT 50

925 A.2d 1026 (Vt. 2007) · Supreme Court of Vermont · May 2, 2007 · No. No. 06-287

Summary

The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of a professional conduct complaint arising from an attorney's late filing of a criminal appeal. The Court held that, under the circumstances, the isolated negligent act did not violate Vermont Rule of Professional Conduct 1.3 because the error was remedied through post-conviction proceedings and the client's appellate rights were preserved.

Holdings

  1. A single isolated act of negligence, without additional conduct compounding the error and absent injury or other aggravating factors, does not necessarily constitute a failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness under Rule 1.3. On the facts presented, respondent's missed filing deadline did not constitute misconduct.
  2. The Supreme Court defers to the Board's findings of fact unless clearly erroneous and gives deference to the Hearing Panel's recommendation, but independently determines the appropriate attorney-discipline sanction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether respondent's single, isolated failure to file a notice of appeal by the deadline constituted a violation of Vermont Rule of Professional Conduct 1.3.
  2. Whether the Professional Responsibility Board properly dismissed the disciplinary complaint after finding that respondent's negligence was remedied and did not warrant discipline.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (9)

  • In re Keitel, 172 Vt. 537, 538, 772 A.2d 507, 509 (2001) (mem.)(followed)
  • In re Blais, 174 Vt. 628, 629-31, 817 A.2d 1266, 1269-70 (2002) (mem.)(followed)
  • In re Berk, 157 Vt. 524, 532, 602 A.2d 946, 950 (1991) (per curiam)(followed)
  • In re PRB File No. 2005.202, Decision No. 81 (Nov. 22, 2005)(analogized)
  • In re PRB File No. 2005.191, Decision No. 90 (Mar. 17, 2006)(distinguished)
  • In re PRB File No. 2004.062, Decision No. 68 (July 3, 2004)(distinguished)
  • In re PRB File No. 2002.219, Decision No. 57 (July 7, 2003)(distinguished)
  • In re PRB File No. 2003.183, Decision No. 56 (June 9, 2003)(distinguished)
  • In re Furlan, Decision No. 65 (May 5, 2004)(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…