State v. M.W.

2012 VT 66 · Supreme Court of Vermont · August 3, 2012 · No. 2011-229

Summary

The Vermont Supreme Court dismissed the State’s interlocutory collateral final order appeal concerning whether 13 V.S.A. § 4815(g)(1) violated separation of powers by limiting a trial court’s authority to order an inpatient competency evaluation. The court held that no justiciable controversy existed because the trial court had not conclusively determined that an inpatient evaluation was warranted or that the statute was unconstitutional. The court therefore did not reach the constitutional merits.

Holdings

  1. The appeal did not satisfy the collateral final order requirements because the trial court had not conclusively determined the disputed question.
  2. The appeal presented no ripe or justiciable controversy because the alleged statutory injury was hypothetical and the trial court had not ruled that an inpatient evaluation was necessary or that the statute prohibited one.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the State’s appeal qualified as a collateral final order appeal under V.R.A.P. 5.1.
  2. Whether the appeal presented a ripe and justiciable controversy concerning the constitutionality of 13 V.S.A. § 4815(g)(1) and its alleged violation of the Vermont Constitution’s separation-of-powers provision.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (6)

  • In re D.L., 164 Vt. 223, 228-29, 669 A.2d 1172, 1176-77 (1995)(followed)
  • In re F.E.F., 156 Vt. 503, 507, 594 A.2d 897, 900 (1991)(followed)
  • United States v. McAllister, 225 F.3d 982, 989 (8th Cir. 2000)(persuasive)
  • Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat’l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979)(persuasive)
  • In re S.N., 2007 VT 47, ¶¶ 7, 9, 181 Vt. 641, 928 A.2d 510 (mem.)(followed)
  • In re Moriarty, 156 Vt. 160, 164, 588 A.2d 1063, 1065 (1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…