In re Stowe Highlands Merger/Subdivision Application

2013 VT 4, 193 Vt. 142 (2013) · Supreme Court of Vermont · January 11, 2013 · No. 2012-100

Summary

The Vermont Supreme Court reviewed an appeal concerning a proposed merger and subdivision of lots within the Stowe Highlands Resort Planned Unit Development. The court held that the existing permit required inclusion of a hotel or resort component but did not restrict Parcel 1 exclusively to that use, and that the proposed amendment did not require a permit-condition change subject to the Stowe Club test. The court affirmed the Environmental Division's reversal and remand to the Development Review Board for further review.

Holdings

  1. The permit and recorded plat required Parcel 1 to include a hotel or inn as part of the Resort Planned Unit Development, but did not restrict the parcel to nothing other than a hotel or inn.
  2. The proposed amendment did not require a change in a permit condition because it preserved the same permitted 21-unit hotel on Parcel 1A; therefore, the Stowe Club test for modifying permit conditions did not apply.
  3. The Supreme Court could suspend the appellate rules in its discretion and decide the fully briefed issue despite the absence of a final judgment and permission for an interlocutory appeal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Resort Planned Unit Development permit or recorded plans imposed a condition restricting Parcel 1 to development solely as a hotel or inn.
  2. Whether the proposed subdivision and merger reduced or otherwise changed the previously permitted 21-unit hotel component so that the Stowe Club test for permit modification applied.
  3. Whether the Supreme Court could reach the merits despite the Environmental Division's interlocutory remand order and the absence of permission for an interlocutory appeal.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • In re Stowe Highlands Resort PUD to PRD Application, 2009 VT 76, 186 Vt. 568, 980 A.2d 233(followed)
  • In re 232511 Investments, Ltd., 2006 VT 27, 179 Vt. 409, 898 A.2d 109(followed)
  • In re Stowe Club Highlands, 166 Vt. 33, 687 A.2d 102 (1996)(applied)
  • In re Stowe Club Highlands, 164 Vt. 272, 668 A.2d 1271 (1995)(followed)
  • In re Hildebrand, 2007 VT 5, ¶¶ 7, 13-15, 181 Vt. 568, 917 A.2d 478(followed)
  • In re Cliffside Leasing Co., 167 Vt. 569, 570, 701 A.2d 325 (1997)(followed)
  • In re Paynter 2-Lot Subdivision, 2010 VT 28, ¶ 3 n.2, 187 Vt. 637, 996 A.2d 219(followed)
  • In re Kostenblatt, 161 Vt. 292, 299, 640 A.2d 39, 44 (1994)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…