Summary
The Vermont Supreme Court held that the trial court had authority under 12 V.S.A. § 4854 to stay execution of a writ of possession for good cause, but could not use a stay to effectively undo the termination of a ground lease following the Association’s adjudicated breach. The court reversed in part and remanded for the trial court to exercise its discretion regarding a shorter stay to facilitate an orderly transition. The court indicated that any extension beyond May 1, 2017 would require adequate security for rent, taxes, insurance, and related liabilities.
Holdings
- Although the trial court could not use a stay to undo the contractual forfeiture, extend possession through the lease term, or otherwise deny MBP's entitlement to possession, it had statutory discretion under 12 V.S.A. § 4854 to grant a shorter stay for good cause to facilitate an orderly transition.
- The trial court had discretion to consider a modest stay lasting weeks or months, but not a stay through 2036 or the requested ten-year period. Any extension beyond May 1, 2017 should be supported by bonding or other advance security protecting MBP against rent, taxes, insurance, waste, and other liabilities caused by the stay.
- The ground lease did not provide an unspecified post-termination period for the Association or homeowners to remove their homes. It required surrender of the property without buildings or structures at the end of the lease term, and repossession upon default pursuant to Vermont law.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court had authority under 12 V.S.A. § 4854 to stay execution of the writ of possession for a shorter period to facilitate an orderly transition after termination of the ground lease.
- Whether the trial court could stay the writ until the lease's scheduled expiration in 2036, or for a comparable multiyear period, based on equitable hardship and the Association's improvements to the property.
- Whether the ground lease provided an unspecified period after termination for the Association or homeowners to remove structures from the property.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Association, 2016 VT 64, 149 A.3d 940(followed)
- State v. Tierney, 138 Vt. 163, 165, 412 A.2d 298, 299 (1980)(followed)
- State v. Cavett, 2015 VT 91, 199 Vt. 546, 126 A.3d 1287(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…