Summary
The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed Lawrence McDowell's convictions for grand larceny and grand larceny with intent to sell or distribute property. The Court held that a Rite-Aid inventory report generated from computerized inventory records qualified as a business record under Virginia's modern Shopbook Rule and was properly admitted to establish the value of stolen merchandise.
Holdings
- The Box-List Sheets Report qualified as a business record and was admissible under the modern Shopbook Rule. It was not necessary for the Commonwealth to call a representative of the outside inventory contractor or a Rite-Aid management witness to verify the earlier inventory or establish that it was conducted in the regular course of business.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Box-List Sheets Report qualified as a business record under Virginia's modern Shopbook Rule even though the underlying inventory had been conducted by an outside contractor and the Commonwealth did not call a representative of that contractor or Rite-Aid management.
- Whether the trial court erred in admitting the report to establish circumstantial evidence of the value of the stolen merchandise.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- McDowell v. Commonwealth, 48 Va. App. 104, 628 S.E.2d 542 (2006)(followed)
- Robinson v. Commonwealth, 258 Va. 3, 516 S.E.2d 475 (1999)(followed)
- Neeley v. Johnson, 215 Va. 565, 211 S.E.2d 100 (1975)(followed)
- Sparks v. Commonwealth, 24 Va. App. 279, 482 S.E.2d 69 (1997)(followed)
- Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Coley & Petersen, Inc., 219 Va. 781, 250 S.E.2d 765 (1979)(followed)
- Ashley v. Commonwealth, 220 Va. 705, 261 S.E.2d 323 (1980)(followed)
- Kettler & Scott, Inc. v. Earth Technology Cos., Inc., 248 Va. 450, 449 S.E.2d 782 (1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…