Summary
The court granted Texas Instruments' motion for summary judgment in a sex discrimination and retaliation action brought under federal and Virginia law. The opinion focuses on whether Virginia's decision in Doss v. Jamco, Inc. eliminated common-law wrongful termination claims based on public policies reflected in the Virginia Human Rights Act. The court held that such a Bowman claim was unavailable for sex discrimination because the relevant public policy was reflected in the Virginia Human Rights Act, and dismissed the claim.
Holdings
- After Doss and the 1995 Lockhart amendments, a plaintiff may not bring a Virginia common-law Bowman wrongful-termination claim based on any public policy reflected in the Virginia Human Rights Act, even if the same policy is also expressed in another statute or in the Virginia Constitution.
- Title VII and the Fourteenth Amendment cannot supply the required expression of Virginia public policy for a Bowman claim; a county ordinance is not a state statute; and the Virginia Constitution cannot support the claim when the asserted sex-discrimination policy is also reflected in the Virginia Human Rights Act.
- Summary judgment for Texas Instruments was proper because, even viewing the evidence in McCarthy's favor, no reasonable jury could find for her on the federal claims.
Questions Presented
- Whether Virginia's 1995 amendments to the Virginia Human Rights Act, as interpreted by Doss v. Jamco, Inc., preclude a common-law Bowman wrongful-termination claim based on a public policy against sex discrimination when that policy is reflected in the Virginia Human Rights Act.
- Whether a Bowman claim may be based on Title VII, the Fourteenth Amendment, a Fairfax County human-rights ordinance, or the Virginia Constitution when the asserted antidiscrimination policy is also reflected in the Virginia Human Rights Act.
- Whether summary judgment was appropriate on the federal sex-discrimination, sexual-harassment, retaliation, and related claims.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (16)
- Doss v. Jamco, Inc., 492 S.E.2d 441 (Va. 1997)(followed)
- Bowman v. State Bank of Keysville, 229 Va. 534, 331 S.E.2d 797 (1985)(followed)
- Lockhart v. Commonwealth Educ. Sys. Corp., 247 Va. 98, 439 S.E.2d 328 (1994)(limited)
- Lawrence Chrysler Plymouth Corp. v. Brooks, 251 Va. 94, 465 S.E.2d 806 (1996)(followed)
- Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 106 Va. 223, 55 S.E. 551 (1906)(followed)
- Miller v. SEVAMP, Inc., 234 Va. 462, 362 S.E.2d 915 (1987)(followed)
- Bradick v. Grumman Data Systems Corp., 486 S.E.2d 545 (Va. 1997)(overruled_authority)
- Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986)(followed)
- Spencer v. General Elec. Co., 894 F.2d 651 (4th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.