Summary
The court denied Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.’s motion to dismiss a negligence claim arising from the sexual assault of a minor customer by an intoxicated man in an Abercrombie dressing room. Applying Virginia law, the court held that allegations that employees observed, suspected, and then lost sight of a suspicious intoxicated visitor approaching a poorly secured dressing-room area plausibly established an imminent probability of harm.
Holdings
- The amended complaint plausibly alleged an imminent probability of injury because Abercrombie's employees knew of a specific, unabated danger posed by Sink immediately before the assault.
- The amended complaint stated a plausible claim for relief, and Abercrombie's motion to dismiss was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether the amended complaint plausibly alleged that Abercrombie had a duty under Virginia law to warn and protect Blackwell from Sink's criminal act because its employees had notice of an imminent probability of harm.
- Whether the amended complaint stated a negligence claim sufficient to survive Abercrombie's Rule 12(b)(6) motion.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Commonwealth v. Peterson, 286 Va. 849, 749 S.E.2d 307 (2013)(followed)
- Thompson v. Skate America, Inc., 261 Va. 121, 128-29, 540 S.E.2d 123 (2001)(followed)
- Kensington Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Md., 684 F.3d 462, 467 (4th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556 (2007)(followed)
- Blackwell v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 2013 WL 6145113(prior decision)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…